the untested city


PROPOSAL

The Experiment

Today, entire new cities are designed and built virtually overnight. This is a recent global phenomenon; China alone plans to build 400 new cities within 30 years. Fueled by economic growth and urban migration, these ‘instant cities’ have become vast fields of urban experimentation, the impetus behind unprecedented scales and rates of architectural development and public infrastructure. However, the imperative for haste in construction preempts even a moment’s reflection on the quantity of outcome. The realities of these untested environments impact personal space and public life in the city, and the effects are best revealed, although notably overlooked, in the performance of public space.

As the gauge of urban success and failure, public space warrants specific evaluation. In this historically unique context, it requires an objective assessment based on the rethinking of established criteria.
This boom in city building – which shows no sign of slowing – is happening as a series of massive but currently scattered experiments. I propose to kickstart the feedback loop to influence the design of future cities with an examination of public spaces in significant new developments around the world.

Contemporary Context

When compared with the traditional city, the new city does not retain the same qualities and structured strata. Urban critiques typically decry the lack of public space in new cities and limit analysis to issues of iconography, speculation, and privatization. Cities are emerging so rapidly there has yet to be in-depth, ground-level documentation to assess the particularities of each situation. At the same time, Almere’s City Center negotiates pedestrian, vehicular, and transit realms through multiplied grounds, and Shenzhen’s village-in-the-city phenomena produce crowded, spontaneous alleyways. A closer examination might reveal that unheralded public space – or a new species of surrogate public space – serves traditional urban needs in unprecedented form.

The Proposal

This Branner Traveling Fellowship proposes the cross-comparison of new cities through the lens of public space. I seek to understand how public landscapes have been influenced by existing conditions, how they are affected by the pace of development, and how they begin to shape the fabric of the emerging city. I intend to study the disparate pieces that form a system within the city and how the performance and co-existence of these zones could inform future implementations that are both responsive and multi-scalar.


2 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I applaud this effort. I too have been wondering about the curious dysfunctionality of public spaces in current architecture and urban design. I have developed some theories about this that would lead to the adoption of guidelines and measures of performance both for research like yours and practice. E.g. occasion opportunity density and image. I could send you some pdf files of work underway if interested; let me know at thormann@nettally.com

Comment by Thorbjoern Mann

Hello Nicolette,

I came across your blog during my search; I am an urbanist/architect working on public space in Beirut (You can check out my blog http://attheedgeofthecity.wordpress.com/).

I find your research questions intriguing, and I think there should be a new layer that critiques the raison d’etre of conventional public space. Maybe the starting point is not from existing definitions of public space, but from a discursive tabula rasa (just like the cities themselves).

I have noticed that Beirut is not within your study scope, but I thought that networking might turn out useful.

Comment by FaDi




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>